Subject	It's not the year of car......
Posted by	ZBlacktt on June 23, 2001 at 3:02 PM
	This message has been viewed 12 times.
In Reply To	what year of a tt do u think i should get? (n/m) posted by bobthemunchie on June 23, 2001 at 02:44 PM
Message	It's miles, condition, price , stock, modds, paint, rust etc,etc.....Mines a 91" with factory paint job, looks mint. Leather is almost new, passenger seat is. No rust at all, etc. I paid 12.5k two years ago w/ 72k miles. Shop around, and somethings did change threw out the years. So if your looking for something like dual air bags, electronic HICAS, etc. then yea, get 94"+ ***NEED NEW SIG SOMEBODY,,,LOL*** ***Being worked on now*** STAGE V++++ Going to XIII and beyond :)
Follow Ups	what year of a tt do u think i should get? (n/m) - bobthemunchie 14:44:44 06/23/01 1995 (n/m) - toyluvr 14:46:15 06/23/01 I second that. (n/m) - 95zTT 14:59:04 06/23/01 It's not the year of car...... - ZBlacktt 15:02:22 06/23/01 That looks VERY nice man... - Caddy Daddy (WI) 16:56:54 06/23/01 you've got mail :)______ (n/m) - 3 double-0 ZX 17:35:48 06/23/01 Low mileage 94/95....... (n/m) - ZZZippy(FL) 15:41:13 06/23/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.